Acisli S, Yaclcuin S, Turgut U. (2011). Effects of the 5E Learning Model on Students’ Academic Achievements in Movement and Force Issues. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 15(1):2459–2462.
Boddy, N.; Watson, K. & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five e’s: a referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33: 27-42.
Bybee, R. W. (2006). The BSCS 5E instruction model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications. Colorado springs: BSCS. International Journal of Man-Machine studies, 29, 407-427.
Bybee, W. Rodger. (2009). The bscs 5E instructional model and v2st century skills. Available online at
www.Sciencedirect.Com.
Ceylan, E. (2008). Effects of 5E learning cycle model on understanding of stat of matter and solubility concepts.
Ergin, I. (2012). Constructivist approach based 5E model and usability instructional physics. Vol. 6, No: 4.sissippi University.
Fazelian P, Navehebrahim A, Soraghi S. (2010). The Effect of 5E instructional Design Model on Learning and Retention of Science for Middle Class Students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science 5. 5(1):140-143.
Gopal,T (2009). Integration of the BSCS 5E instructional method and technology in an anatomy and physiology lab. Doctoral dissertation, Southern Miss.
Hasanpor dehkordi A, Kheiri S, Shahrani M.(2008). ]The effect of teaching using, problem base learning and lecture on behavior, attitude and learning of nursing (BSc) students. J Shahrekord University Medical Science. (3) :p 76-82.(in Persian).
Hui-Chuan, L. (2006). Effects of cooperative learning on motivation, learning strategy utilization, and grammar achievement of English language learners in Taiwan. (Doctoral dissertation). University of New Orleans.
Karsli, F, Alipaşa. (2014). Developing a Laboratory Activity by Using 5e Learning Model on Student Learning of Factors Affecting the Reaction Rate and Improving Scientific Process Skills. Procardia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143: 663 – 668.
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning, 6(1).
Maryannakis, Artemios. (2009). Effectiveness of objectivist online instructional graduate learners knowledge and competence. Doctoral Dissertation, Capella University.
Melton, B.; Zience, A.; Leonard, S.; Pick, E. & Thomasson, L. (2003). A Comparison of Behaviorist and Constructivist-Based Teaching Methods in Psychomotor instruction. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 53 (1).
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning, 6(1).
Spence, L. (2004); The 5 E,s instructional Model for constructivism. Available At: http://www.scseagrant.org/ sec see/document/legacy04-%20template.doc.
Suciati, A. Vincentrisia, Ismiyatin. (2015). Application of learning cycle model (5E) learning with chart variation toward students creativity. Journal pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 4 (1). P 56-66.
Tuna, A.; Kacar, A. (2013). The effect of 5E learning cycle model in teaching trigonometry on students’ academic achievement and the permanent of their knowledge. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4 (1), Article: 07.
Tyagi, K. & Verma, I. (2013). Influence of Constructivism in Teaching on Academic Achievement of Primary Students. Journal of Education & Research for Sustainable Development (JERSD). 1 (1).
Yadigaroglu & Demircioglu, (2012). The effect of activities based on 5e model on grade 10 students understanding of gas concept. Proceeded - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47: 634 – 637.
Zekri, Y. (2002). The relationship between achievement motivation and personality type high school students in first and second and third Mar and. (Master dissertation). Open University (in Persian).